True detective - A character analysis


On a friend's suggestion, recently I watched the series from HBO, True detective. The story had many dimensions but I do not want to dig deep into the story. It didn't interest me. I was more intrigued by the two principal characters in this series, Rust Cohle and Marty Hart. The way these characters, their life and their thoughts about life has been defined, you can't help but see yourself as a bit in both of them. I cannot talk on behalf of the writer; I haven't read any of his interviews. But I feel this series focused on exploring the psyche of humans, the "programming" as Rust would call it, rather than the story itself.

I watched this series only once and I have only analyzed these characters as much as my programming allowed me to. But there were couple of gems that I noticed, which I wanted to talk about. Now, even the writer might not have thought about these interpretations and I might be over analyzing it. But I guess that's what good writing seeks to do. Anyway, I hope it doesn't end up like this.

The first thing to do, would be to refresh your memory about the "programming" that I was talking about. Watch this scene. In this scene, the characters and their line of thinking gets well-defined to the viewers here. Rust Cohle appears cold, brooding and unemotional. He is a rationalist; he seeks questions about life but more on the pointlessness of it. He seeks nothing, so he has excluded faith, religion or hope from his life. As for Marty Hart, he comes across as a regular bloke. A regular bloke that each one of us, think that others are. The "programming" that Rust mentions, has a meaning that is little open ended. It could be hinting at the human's quest for finding a purpose, I don't know. But one thing is clear, Rust wants to deny this programming, whereas Marty has embraced it. Marty veers off from this programming once in a while, his infidelity is a case in point. But lets look further at their conversations. After all these intense dialogues by Rust, at the fag end of the scene:

Marty: “Don’t say that! When you come over to the house, don’t say any of that shit!” 
Rust:  “Of course, man, I’m not some kind of maniac.” 

For a casual observer, Rust's dialog is a natural comeback, perhaps even funny. But I was thinking, that in the earlier exchanges between them, the writer took the pain of asserting that Rust is intense and dont-give-a-damn-what-others-think kind of guy. But here, the writer gives Rust a leeway, he is more amiable. This is interesting. I guess the ability of a rationalist to be self aware of his desire to deny his programming, is what differentiates him from a psychopath. Talking from Rust's perspective, it also seems that he transitioned himself from being a regular dude to a realist. It seems that before his kid's death, he followed his programming to the T.  And when this was disturbed, he switched to "reality". There are so many other psychological interpretations of these characters and their interactions that I am not able to consciously grasp at them to write them out on paper. If a Rust Cohle was reading this, most of it would be bull shit, but he would still nod his head in approval.  






News addict.

I have always been a news addict. Since childhood.

And some time back I read this "news".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli

When I was growing up, "The Hindu" was the only source of news. I didn't watch news on TV and there was no internet.

Even when electronic news arrived, I preferred reading hard copy of "The Hindu".

But now, after coming to US, news consumption has changed for the worse. My focus has changed to NDTV, IBNLive, CNN, Google news etc. I am even addicted to watching Arnab Goswami's debates, mostly for comic relief. But that's certainly a new low.

The article says "Out of the ­10,000 news stories you may have read in the last 12 months, did even one allow you to make a better decision about a serious matter in your life".

Seriously, I don't remember one. What I remember right now are how bombs and guns are going off in USA and how shitty governance is in India.

So today, with the sacred sanctity of this blog as a sakshi, I make an oath to stop reading news for a week and then check how it has improved my life. I am sure if not anything else, I will get back a lot of time.

Gradually, I would like to shift to reading hindu.com alone. And maybe economist.

So that means, no reliance-owned media, no american news, no reddit, no checking news feeds in twitter and no quora(or  maybe a little quora)



Deal with it



On a lazy sunday afternoon, that is today, I met this blog after a long time. Flipping through my old posts in this one and the alzeonz blog, I can't help but feel how naive I have been, in writing a humour blog or in replying to comments. To give a perspective, I started blogging in 2008. Every couple of years, when I read something sarcastic or funny that I wrote a long time back, I noticed that my humour is quite stale. This is quite contradictory because when I write something that is supposed to be funny, my mind goes through these following flow-chart process. First whether the statement is funny and does it make me laugh. Then I visualize whether it would make the person reading it laugh. After making sure that the statement would go through all these quality controls, only then I write it down. 

I am a stickler in making sure that all my online interactions have to sound cool. That is whether, it is a tweet or email or a comment, it has to be cool. Maybe this behaviour is because I am so uncool in real life. And why is that, every couple of years, when I read back my "cool" writing, it turns out to bbe incredibly meh. Makes me squirm. All my witty repartee has sort of a convent-1960's british style to it. 

Why isn't humor timeless? Why is it that some writing that is funny at the moment, always "mehhhhh" later. It's not the case with tragedy posts or fantasy posts. Tragedy posts can always make you sad. Okay now my mind voice is saying to me, dei ennada solla varae.

So anyway I am going to say this to myself retroactively."Vivek, This post is going to be so lame in a couple of years when you read it again." So DEAL WITH IT.

Digression: I miss personal blogging a lot. All this social network has totally destroyed it. I was hoping Tumblr would make personal blogging cool again but that has fizzled out too. Quora seems to be making blogging popular again but I don't think you can write stupid, arbit posts like this one on Quora.   They would be downvoted to oblivion or not voted at all(equally bad to your ego). Same reason why facebook notes is not popular, for personal blogging. This voting reward mechanism for blogging platforms, especially a personal blogging platform, would never work. Personal blogging is like having a conversation. People have personal blogs because they want to record something or because they want to talk about something which are seemingly insignificant to be talked in person. Imagine if conversations also have a reward mechanism.

       Person A: ( says something  )
       Person B: I like what you said. 
       Person A: (says something )
     Person B: That's a stupid ass statement. I am downvoting you. 

If this is the way all conversations are going to be, conversations will die too. Anyway why did personal blogging die? Why has it not been able to re-invent itself? Lack of time in this modern fast paced world? Somehow I can never attribute this reason to the decline in personal blogging. Personal blogs were once a rage, there were tight knit communities around them. But now, why is that everyone has been satisfied with 140 character limit to their thoughts. Why are people wasting their time watching how other's live without wanting to record their own? Personal blogs traffic has dwindled but FB/Twitter show no signs of slowing down. Why is that? Doesn't all products on internet have cyclical usage patterns. 

Of course, I am not making the assessment of decline in personal blogging objectively. I know the objective reasons of it's death. It's a philosophical assessment. My belief is that blogging in general could have impacted societies in a way better than social networks. Blogging requires patience and seeks clarity. For instance, let's contrast the impact of blogs and short form social media in Indian politics. Thanks to social media, right now there are two factions, Modi baiters and Rahul Gandi bashers. Both factions are not mutually exclusive. The common factor between these two factions are they are horribly mis-informed. All they know are interesting "tidbits" about their respective protagonists, and not enough knowledge to make an informed opinion. These "tidbits" are being fed through FB/Twitter. Now let's assume these were not present and blogs were the only type of social media. Since trolling on blogs are much harder, in sum totality, blogs might present a balanced perspective instead of skewed ones delivered by the short form FB/Twitter. This short form of communication are making people incredibly intolerant. Another case are those Tamil Nadu protests against Sri Lanka. They are to a large extent, undoubtedly exacerbated through this short form social media. A majority of these naive population probably have an idea implanted in their heads that "okay all tamilians are getting killed over there.". Not many would know the complex history of LTTE-Sinhala. 

But to play the devil's advocate, would outrage against governments like in case of Delhi gang rape, have happened if short form social media were not present?

/end of rant

P.S Wanted to put a small nostalgic note on my blog and ended up ranting against social networks. Of late, this is how my mind has been working. It is a swathe of thoughts. Peel one, there's another fresh set of thoughts underneath. Shite! Few years back, I had a clear mind. But of late, I can witness my mind turning to a beehive. Now I can understand why mediation is famous and Deepak Chopra is infamous. He who has a clear horizon, is the happiest and I want it.



Humbling..

..every single time i read this, with Carl Sagan's voice.

Pale blue dot ~ Carl Sagan

We succeeded in taking that picture [from deep space], and, if you look at it, you see a dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever lived, lived out their lives. The aggregate of all our joys and sufferings, thousands of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilizations, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every hopeful child, every mother and father, every inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.

The earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of the dot on scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner of the dot. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity – in all this vastness – there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. It is up to us. It's been said that astronomy is a humbling, and I might add, a character-building experience. To my mind, there is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly and compassionately with one another and to preserve and cherish that pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.

Navras

From ignorance lead me to truth
From darkness lead me to light
From death lead me to immortality

Joy


The gushing meadows, the tittering birds,
The spraying rain, the longing pain,
The mystical mist,
The silent hope,
Where has the joy gone?

Homesick!

Kind of feeling homesick right now. I want to talk to mom but she must have slept now. Hmmm, Now i have to wait another seven hours. Aaaaaargh.


Life suddenly has turned super hectic. The first week, i fell sick just by realizing the imminent load of graduate studies. But somehow, the next couple of weeks have gone well. "Well", in a sense, that time has been managed just right. But i wish i had some breathing space.

This place is very beautiful. You can see deers straying around here akin to cattle and dogs straying in India(Obligatory Indian reference). There is a wide variety of flora and fauna. The squirrels here are so huge, fed copiously by the squirrel feeding club here. And i find a lot of these bush animals whose names i have no idea of. They just skirt past the road in a flash, evoking that rare moment of peacefulness within me.

I am beginning to like the part time job at Bursley canteen. Not few weeks i wanted to quit, but now iam beginning to enjoy it. It's probably be going to be my only job away from a PC. Well now the real reason is, i get to eat awesome unlimited amount of food for 4 bucks!